Sure,
I’m asking a controversial question. And
I’ve probably shocked you by even asking it.
But I think it’s justified nevertheless.
Since
the first “Girl Scout” uniform option was proposed in the 1908 edition of
“Scouting for Boys” there have been arguments about Guiding uniform. Style, fabric, cut, quality, practicality,
colour, durability, laundering, the lot.
Yes, every possible cause for objection was and is given by Leaders with unfailing regularity about every version
of the uniform from the first version to the current. Nevertheless, until recent years all members
accepted that, whether we cared for the uniform of the day or not, part of the
deal we accepted in joining the organisation was that we would wear the
organisation’s uniform. At all weekly
meetings, on all outings, and during arrival, departure, and any offsite
activities when at camp/holiday. The
only time uniform would not be worn whilst at Guiding events, would be when
carrying out those outdoor activities which made it impractical to do so, in
the case of recruits who were given a few weeks’ grace whilst they were
deciding whether or not to become full members and saving up towards getting
their uniform, and during the onsite time at camp - where clothes in Guiding
colours sufficed.
Why
did we have a uniform at all? The aim was
to camouflage social difference, and make all of the girls equal in appearance
regardless of background or social standing.
In the twenties and thirties, for some girls in poorer areas, their
Guide uniform was the smartest outfit they owned, hence the number of studio
photos from that era which feature girls wearing their Guide uniforms. For those who hadn’t the money to buy their uniform
from the Guide shop, there was the option of buying a dressmaking pattern and a
length of fabric – many more girls then were taught practical dressmaking than
nowadays.
From
the 1970s onwards, there grew a custom in some areas, of participants getting
matching sweatshirts or t-shirts made for wearing when on a trip abroad with a
Guiding group. The idea was that it
would be impractical for them to wear their uniforms every day, as the
logistics for laundry would forbid – but they still felt that they should
appear as a unified group, in matching clothing. It was always made clear that during the
trip, on any given day, all participants would wear the same garb whether
uniform or group fun-top – and that post-event, the fun top would be a leisure
or camp-wear garment only, not to be worn at unit meetings, or at any other
occasion where Guiding uniform would normally be worn.
Since
then, in some units at least, things have changed significantly. Some blame it on mix-and-match uniform. Some claim there is a more relaxed attitude
to uniform-wearing in society (although most evidence seems entirely to the
contrary – nowadays more schools and clubs are enforcing uniform rules, or
creating rules where none existed, than have done for many years). Yet for whatever reason, in Guiding we now
see adults turning up at unit meetings wearing non-uniform garments, and making
no apology for doing so – and naturally, the girls copy their example. We see some units claiming that an unofficial
unit fun-top counts as uniform despite the manual making clear that that is 100%
untrue. And as a result we see parents
in some units being pressured to buy not only the uniform the girl will need,
but to also go to the expense of buying an unofficial unit garment as well! It’s unnecessary duplication, not to mention
the environmental and moral questions which are raised by all these extra garments
being made which can only be worn a few times a year at most – and with no
guarantee they are sourced from the most ethical or safe of factories. And of course, they will be outgrown within a
couple of years anyway.
Given
the increasing proliferation of unofficial garments, and the lax attitude to
the wearing of Guiding uniform at unit meetings on the part of some Leaders, I
think that we in the UK are rapidly approaching a crossroads, and now need to
decide which path we are going to take.
There are a lot of assumptions being made – for instance, that because
we always have been a uniformed organisation, we thus will always continue to
be. But – that’s an assumption, and it
need not necessarily be so. Like any
tradition, it’s only worth retaining if it can be justified in both current and
all foreseeable circumstances.
And I
don’t see any sign of us going down the US route of semi-uniform, such as the
wearing of a uniform sash or waistcoat over mufti. After all, the sashes we’ve got haven’t
proved terribly popular (the Guide one was dropped many years ago, the Brownie
one still attracts as many complaints as fans despite the tweaks that have been
made to it over the years. And there has
never been a tradition here of wearing buttonless waistcoats. No, I think the decision we face is a
straightforward either/or choice.
If we
want to continue being a uniformed organisation, then each one of us needs to
proactively sign up to that, in our Districts and in especially in our
units. To start with ourselves and our
personal example, which after all is more influential with the girls than we
might expect. Deeds are more powerful
than words. Leader uniform is a
legitimate unit expense. And it isn’t
difficult to keep a top in one’s bag or at the hall, and to quickly change into
it on arrival. And once all the unit
Leaders are setting the example every week, we then have to ensure every girl
in our units also has the opportunity to own and wear proper uniform. So we should make sure they all know where it
can be bought, whether that’s a Guide shop, depot, local shop or mail
order. We should offer help and advice
on sourcing second-hand for those who would find that useful. We might have a stock of spare tops for those
who ‘forget’ theirs. We should have an
awareness of the hardship funds which are available locally for those who might
find cost a barrier. We should be ready
to contact Trading to enquire about placing a ‘special order’ for any girl who
would not find the usual sizes a good fit.
Oh yes, I’ve heard all the complaints about the garments themselves,
heard them every year since I joined the Brownies myself all those years ago,
through each of the umpteen versions of uniform we’ve had in that time. After all, there were complaints about the
quality of Promise badges back in 1912!
Nevertheless, as a movement we have a clear choice - either we have a
uniform and we all wear it – properly, whether we do so enthusiastically or we
do so reluctantly.
Or -
we ditch having uniform altogether, and have no rules or expectations about
what garments any of the unit members will wear on any given occasion, leaving
it entirely up to the individual’s personal taste/judgement and common sense to
decide what is and isn’t appropriate, bar occasional suggestions in regard to
safety for the activities scheduled on a particular day. Fudging the uniform issue, or turning a blind
eye to units which attend events in non-uniform garments - solves nothing. Regardless of what garments they may happen
to be wearing, regardless of whether some of these garments happen to be
matching or not, and regardless of whatever opinion anyone holds about the comparative
smartness or scruffiness of their attire.
The facts are simple - you’re either in Guiding uniform, or you are in
mufti, there is no in-between, nothing counts as uniform bar what is on the
official list, nothing else is or can be equivalent.
So – decision time. Should we have a uniform which is worn by all
members at all meetings and all other events where we are representing Guiding
- or should we drop having a uniform entirely?
No comments:
Post a Comment